perm filename HUG[4,KMC] blob
sn#095211 filedate 1974-04-03 generic text, type T, neo UTF8
00100 IS HUG HUGGABLE?
00200
00300
00400
00500 Bad news sells best because we can say "Thank God - it
00600 didnt happen to me" and thus we reassure ourselves that we are
00700 still alive.
00800 Newspaper reporters are trained to get the name, age, sex (if
00900 unclear), occupation and address of agents and/or victims. Presumably
01000 most readers utilize these variables for their personal calculus in
01100 comparing the self with other people.
01200 Thus:
01300 Name - Do I know him? Have I heard of him? Is he a member of
01400 my groups (ethnic, religious, etc.)?
01500 Age - Is he close or distant in age? (What happens to the elders
01600 and the youth doesn't happen to me).
01700 Sex - (The opposite sex has its own problems).
01800 Occupation - Is this my work or related to it?
01900 Address - Does he live near me? What part of town is this? What
02000 groups live there?
02100 I would hence change the beginning question from "what do you
02200 know after you have understood the story" to "what do you know after
02300 you have interpreted (been affected by) the story?"
02400 An intelligent organism or machine, in the enduring pursuit
02500 of its interests, intentions, or values, can change its behavior in
02600 accordance with changing circumstances. To change one needs relevant
02700 information about what happens to others as a source of analogical
02800 reasoning. Say machine A, not being able to identify with Hug except
02900 perhaps as a person to whom a bad thing happened, interprets the
03000 story as one of race relations and economic injustice. Say machine B,
03100 with a world-view analogous to a New York furniture salesman,
03200 interprets (is affected by) the story as a warning about what he has
03300 to watch out for. Which machine is intelligent? Both are. They will
03400 have some overlap in what they know (i.e. what questions they can
03500 answer)but there is an unbounded set of questions whose answers they
03600 do not share.
03700 (Incidentally I would add to the "categories of information"
03800 one called "About values", i.e. what is desirable or undesirable
03900 about situations).
04000 John used as "grist for the mill" a chess problem from the
04100 Scientific American. This problem is relevant to his interests and is
04200 now in long term memory. In that issue there is also an article on
04300 the biological control of dung. Quick now - who controls it?
04500 Thus I contend that an intelligent program or machine must
04600 contain a lattice or semilattice of strategies insuring a
04700 continuation or enhancement of its existence. Its knowledge will
04800 reflect what is considers essential and inessential to its interests.
04900 Otherwise everything or nothing will be relevant. In the first case
05000 it will flounder from an overload of information and become
05100 psychotic. In the second case it will have so little information as
05200 to be uninteresting to anything else intelligent and will die from
05300 neglect.